Home/Guidelines
Guidelines

Chest Pain NICE CG95 Simplified for SBA Exams

Chest Pain NICE CG95 simplified for SBA exams: troponin pathways, risk scores, and the discriminator clues examiners use in ACS-style stems.

Chest Pain NICE CG95 Simplified for SBA Exams

Chest Pain NICE CG95 Simplified for SBA Exams

TL;DR — NICE CG95 chest pain: troponin pathways (high-sensitivity), GRACE score, and the discriminator clues for stable angina vs ACS that examiners reuse.

Last updated: 30 May 2026


Algorithm at a glance

Adult chest pain
possible ACS
ECG within 10 minutes
ST elevation
or new LBBB?
YES ↓
STEMI pathway:
PPCI within 120 min
NO ↓
High-sensitivity troponin at 0 hours
Trop below limit of detection
plus low-risk score
plus normal ECG?
YES ↓
Rule out MI
discharge with safety net
NO ↓
Repeat troponin at 1 or 3 hours
Delta troponin
above 99th centile?
YES ↓
NSTEMI: dual antiplatelet
plus GRACE score
GRACE more than 140?
YES ↓
Early invasive angio
within 24 hours
NO ↓
Conservative or
delayed invasive
NO ↓
Unstable angina vs non-cardiac
further workup
NICE CG95 high-sensitivity troponin pathway for chest pain.

Chest pain is one of the commonest and highest-risk Emergency Department presentations. It is heavily examined because it tests immediate resuscitation, recognition of life-threatening pathology, ECG interpretation, troponin use, risk stratification, safe disposition, and awareness of important guideline changes. For UK exams, candidates need two parallel frameworks in mind: the legacy NICE CG95 timing-based approach that still appears in SBA questions, and modern ED practice based on ECG, clinical risk, serial assessment, and validated high-sensitivity troponin pathways.

Why Chest Pain NICE CG95 Matters in the Emergency Department

Chest pain is not synonymous with myocardial infarction. The first task is to identify the unstable patient and the immediately life-threatening diagnosis. Acute coronary syndrome is common, but aortic dissection, pulmonary embolism, tension pneumothorax, pericardial tamponade, and oesophageal rupture can all present with chest pain and can all kill quickly.

In exams, chest pain questions often hinge on one of the following:

  • recognising ACS despite a normal initial ECG
  • not being falsely reassured by atypical symptoms
  • distinguishing acute chest pain from stable exertional angina
  • knowing that exercise ECG is no longer first-line for diagnosing stable angina
  • knowing that CT coronary angiography is first-line for stable chest pain of possible coronary origin
  • understanding that troponin interpretation depends on timing, assay, and clinical context
  • spotting a non-ACS killer hidden in an ACS-style stem

Key Definitions

Term Meaning
Acute coronary syndrome Umbrella term including STEMI, NSTEMI, and unstable angina
STEMI Acute coronary occlusion causing ST elevation or another occlusion pattern requiring urgent reperfusion decision-making
NSTEMI Myocardial infarction without ST elevation, diagnosed by symptoms suggestive of ischaemia plus troponin rise and/or fall
Unstable angina Ischaemic symptoms without troponin rise meeting MI criteria; less common in the hs-troponin era but still examinable
Stable angina Predictable exertional chest discomfort relieved by rest or GTN, usually due to fixed coronary stenosis
Typical angina All 3 present: constricting discomfort, precipitated by exertion, relieved by rest or GTN within about 5 minutes
Atypical angina Exactly 2 of the 3 typical angina features
Non-anginal chest pain One or none of the 3 typical angina features
CT coronary angiography First-line investigation for stable chest pain of possible coronary origin under NICE CG95

Exam pearl: typical, atypical, and non-anginal classifications are stable chest pain tools. They are not ACS rule-out tools in the ED.

Essential Pathophysiology

ACS usually results from plaque rupture or erosion with thrombus formation, causing partial or complete coronary artery occlusion. Complete or near-complete occlusion produces transmural ischaemia and classically ST elevation or another occlusion pattern. Partial occlusion more often produces NSTEMI or unstable angina.

Troponin reflects myocardial injury, not specifically type 1 MI. A raised troponin may occur in:

  • type 1 MI
  • type 2 MI from supply-demand mismatch
  • tachyarrhythmia
  • heart failure
  • myocarditis
  • pulmonary embolism
  • sepsis
  • renal impairment
  • critical illness

Stable angina usually reflects fixed coronary narrowing causing demand-induced ischaemia during exertion. In contrast, acute chest pain from dissection, PE, pneumothorax, tamponade, or oesophageal rupture has different mechanisms and different immediate priorities.

Clinical Presentation

Classical ACS symptoms include central chest pressure, heaviness, tightness, or squeezing, often radiating to the arm, jaw, neck, shoulder, or back. Associated features include diaphoresis, nausea, vomiting, and breathlessness.

Features increasing the likelihood of ACS include:

  • pain lasting more than 15 minutes
  • pain at rest or with minimal exertion
  • new-onset chest pain
  • crescendo angina or abrupt deterioration in previously stable angina
  • radiation to one or both arms, especially the right arm or both arms
  • associated autonomic symptoms
  • syncope or presyncope
  • haemodynamic instability

Features that lower the probability of ACS but do not exclude it include:

  • sharp pain
  • pleuritic pain
  • positional pain
  • pain reproducible on palpation

Atypical presentations are common in:

  • older adults
  • women
  • patients with diabetes
  • patients with chronic kidney disease

These patients may present with:

  • dyspnoea
  • fatigue
  • epigastric discomfort
  • collapse
  • confusion
  • minimal or no chest pain

Red Flags and High-Risk Features

These features should push you away from a low-risk chest pain pathway and towards urgent senior review, monitored care, and rapid investigation:

  • haemodynamic instability
  • hypoxia
  • ongoing severe pain
  • syncope or near-syncope
  • new heart failure
  • arrhythmia
  • marked diaphoresis
  • neurological deficit
  • pulse deficit
  • inter-arm blood pressure difference
  • sudden tearing pain radiating to the back
  • raised JVP with hypotension
  • features of shock

High-yield exam associations:

  • tearing chest pain, pulse deficit, or focal neurology suggests aortic dissection
  • hypotension with raised JVP and clear lungs suggests tamponade, RV infarction, or massive PE
  • pleuritic pain with tachycardia and hypoxia suggests PE
  • sudden unilateral pleuritic pain with reduced breath sounds suggests pneumothorax
  • severe chest pain after vomiting suggests oesophageal rupture

Differential Diagnosis

Diagnosis Typical clues Important tests
ACS pressure or tightness, radiation, autonomic symptoms, exertional or rest pain, risk factors ECG, serial ECGs, hs-troponin
Aortic dissection sudden severe tearing pain, back pain, pulse deficit, BP difference, neurology, collapse ECG, CXR, CT aorta, bedside echo in unstable patients
Pulmonary embolism pleuritic pain, dyspnoea, tachycardia, hypoxia, syncope, VTE risk factors ECG, CXR, D-dimer if appropriate, CTPA
Tension pneumothorax sudden pleuritic pain, dyspnoea, unilateral reduced breath sounds, shock if tension clinical diagnosis if tension, CXR or ultrasound if stable
Pericarditis sharp pleuritic pain, worse lying flat, better sitting forward, viral prodrome ECG, troponin, echo if concern about effusion
Tamponade hypotension, raised JVP, muffled heart sounds, dyspnoea, pulsus paradoxus bedside echo
Oesophageal rupture severe pain after vomiting, sepsis, surgical emphysema CXR, CT chest with specialist input
Musculoskeletal pain localised, reproducible, movement-related, otherwise well clinical diagnosis after excluding serious causes
GORD/oesophageal spasm burning retrosternal discomfort, post-prandial, reflux symptoms clinical context; do not assume benign in high-risk patients

Exam trap: reproducible chest wall tenderness does not safely exclude ACS.

Initial ED Assessment

Start with ABCDE. Assess the patient before labelling the pain.

Immediate priorities:

  • identify instability
  • look for STEMI or another occlusion pattern
  • consider non-ACS life threats
  • obtain a 12-lead ECG within 10 minutes
  • place high-risk patients on monitoring
  • gain IV access and take bloods
  • repeat ECGs if symptoms recur or evolve

A practical ED sequence is:

  1. ABCDE and observations
  2. Focused history: onset, character, radiation, duration, exertional component, associated symptoms, risk factors, previous CAD, cocaine use, VTE risk, dissection features
  3. Focused examination: cardiovascular, respiratory, pulses, BP in both arms if dissection suspected, signs of heart failure, DVT signs, chest wall tenderness
  4. ECG within 10 minutes
  5. Early decision: ACS, alternative life threat, or lower-risk undifferentiated chest pain

Legacy NICE CG95 timing framework still appears in exams. Ask:

  • Is the patient having chest pain now?
  • If not, when was the last episode?
CG95-style timing group Exam-style action
Current chest pain with suspected ACS Immediate emergency assessment and management
Pain-free now, but pain within last 12 hours If resting ECG abnormal or unavailable: emergency referral. If ECG normal: urgent same-day assessment
Pain 12 to 72 hours ago with suspected ACS Urgent same-day assessment
Pain more than 72 hours ago Assess for stable angina, non-cardiac causes, or unresolved pathology

Important exam note: this timing framework is mainly legacy NICE wording. In current UK ED practice, many patients with suspected ACS and recent pain will undergo ED-based serial ECGs and hs-troponin testing rather than simple timing-based referral decisions.

Investigations

The ECG is the highest-yield first investigation.

ECG

Key principles:

  • a normal ECG does not exclude ACS
  • serial ECGs improve sensitivity
  • repeat the ECG during pain if possible
  • compare with previous ECGs if available

ECG findings requiring urgent action include:

  • ST elevation in contiguous leads
  • posterior MI pattern
  • de Winter pattern
  • dynamic ischaemic changes with ongoing pain

Posterior MI clues:

  • horizontal ST depression in V1 to V3
  • tall R waves in V1 to V3
  • upright T waves in anterior leads where they should not be prominent

If suspected, record posterior leads V7 to V9 and discuss urgently with cardiology/PPCI services. Treat as likely acute coronary occlusion. Do not wait for troponin.

Other high-yield ECG patterns:

  • de Winter pattern: upsloping ST depression with tall symmetrical T waves in anterior leads, suggesting proximal LAD occlusion
  • Wellens pattern: deeply inverted or biphasic T waves in V2 to V3 during pain-free periods, suggesting critical LAD disease
  • inferior MI with possible RV involvement: inferior ST elevation, especially if hypotension and clear lungs; consider right-sided leads
  • widespread ST depression with ST elevation in aVR: may suggest left main stem, proximal LAD, or severe triple-vessel disease in the right context

LBBB is not an automatic STEMI equivalent. It may obscure ischaemia and should increase urgency, but interpretation depends on clinical context, comparison with old ECGs, and strongly suspicious ischaemic changes. Older exam questions may overstate the significance of new LBBB.

Troponin

Use troponin when ACS or myocardial injury is a realistic possibility, or where local chest pain pathways indicate testing. It should not be sent indiscriminately without a clinical question.

Troponin interpretation principles:

  • use the local validated high-sensitivity assay pathway
  • interpret against time from symptom onset
  • a single negative troponin does not exclude MI if taken too early or outside a validated rule-out pathway
  • serial testing may be required
  • a rise and/or fall pattern supports acute myocardial injury
  • an elevated troponin is not synonymous with type 1 MI

Common exam points:

  • very early presenters may need repeat troponin even if the first is negative
  • chronically elevated troponin may occur in CKD and chronic structural heart disease
  • PE, myocarditis, sepsis, tachyarrhythmia, and heart failure can all raise troponin
  • unstable angina can still occur with negative troponin

Other investigations

  • FBC, U&Es, creatinine, glucose
  • CXR if alternative thoracic pathology is suspected or if clinically useful
  • VBG or ABG if unwell, hypoxic, or acidotic
  • D-dimer only if using an appropriate PE rule-out strategy in a suitable patient
  • bedside echo or POCUS in unstable undifferentiated chest pain
  • CT aorta if dissection suspected
  • CTPA if PE suspected and indicated

CXR is not a rule-out test for ACS. A normal CXR does not exclude dissection, PE, or oesophageal rupture.

Stable chest pain investigation under NICE CG95

For stable chest pain of possible coronary origin, CT coronary angiography is first-line. Exercise ECG is not recommended as a first-line diagnostic test for stable angina.

If CTCA is:

  • normal: coronary disease is less likely and alternative diagnoses should be considered
  • non-diagnostic: further imaging may be needed
  • shows CAD of uncertain functional significance: functional imaging may be used

Invasive coronary angiography is not the routine first-line diagnostic test for most stable chest pain presentations.

Management in the Emergency Department

Management depends on whether the patient is unstable, has likely ACS, or has another life-threatening diagnosis.

Immediate ED management

  1. ABCDE and treat immediate threats
  2. 12-lead ECG within 10 minutes
  3. Monitoring, IV access, bloods
  4. Analgesia
  5. Oxygen only if hypoxic; do not give routine oxygen to normoxic ACS patients
  6. Repeat ECGs if pain persists or recurs
  7. Escalate early if STEMI, occlusion pattern, shock, arrhythmia, or alternative catastrophic diagnosis suspected

Suspected ACS

Core ED principles:

  • give aspirin 300 mg as soon as possible unless contraindicated or an alternative diagnosis such as dissection makes antiplatelet therapy unsafe
  • use GTN cautiously for pain relief if appropriate
  • provide opioid analgesia if needed
  • do not give routine oxygen unless hypoxic
  • use local ACS pathways for antiplatelet and anticoagulant decisions
  • obtain urgent cardiology input for STEMI or likely occlusion MI

Critical warning: if aortic dissection is a realistic possibility, do not reflexively give antiplatelets or anticoagulation before senior review and diagnostic clarification.

STEMI or likely acute coronary occlusion

Features include:

  • ST elevation in contiguous leads
  • posterior MI pattern
  • de Winter pattern
  • other convincing occlusion pattern with ongoing ischaemic symptoms

Action:

  • activate the local PPCI or urgent reperfusion pathway
  • do not wait for troponin before escalating
  • continue monitoring and supportive care

NSTEMI or unstable angina

These patients usually need:

  • serial ECGs
  • hs-troponin testing according to local protocol
  • risk assessment
  • admission or observation depending on findings and pathway completion
  • cardiology discussion where indicated

Risk scores such as HEART, TIMI, or GRACE may appear in exams and may be used locally, but they are adjuncts. They do not replace clinical judgement, ECG interpretation, troponin pathways, or local protocol.

If another life-threatening diagnosis is suspected

  • Aortic dissection: urgent senior review, blood pressure control if appropriate, CT aorta or bedside echo depending on stability, early cardiothoracic/vascular input
  • PE: assess severity, anticoagulate if appropriate and diagnosis sufficiently likely, consider thrombolysis in massive PE with specialist input
  • Tension pneumothorax: immediate decompression, then definitive chest drain
  • Tamponade: urgent echo and specialist intervention
  • Oesophageal rupture: nil by mouth, broad-spectrum antibiotics, urgent surgical input

Disposition, Referral and Follow-Up

Disposition should be based on the whole picture: symptoms, ECG, troponin pathway, risk, and alternative diagnoses.

Usually admit or keep under monitored observation

  • STEMI or likely occlusion MI
  • positive troponin consistent with acute myocardial injury or infarction
  • dynamic ECG changes
  • ongoing or recurrent pain
  • haemodynamic instability
  • arrhythmia
  • heart failure
  • high-risk alternative diagnosis suspected
  • incomplete rule-out pathway

May be suitable for discharge

Only if all of the following apply:

  • no concerning alternative diagnosis
  • serial assessment is reassuring
  • ECGs are non-ischaemic
  • validated local hs-troponin rule-out pathway is completed appropriately
  • clinical risk is low
  • clear safety-netting is provided

Safety-netting should include advice to return urgently for recurrent chest pain, breathlessness, syncope, or deterioration.

Stable chest pain follow-up

Patients with stable exertional symptoms suggestive of angina should usually be referred for outpatient assessment, with CTCA as first-line investigation under NICE CG95.

Special Groups

Paediatrics

Serious cardiac causes of chest pain are much less common in children than in adults. Common causes are musculoskeletal, respiratory, gastrointestinal, or anxiety-related. However, red flags include exertional syncope, known congenital heart disease, arrhythmia symptoms, family history of sudden cardiac death, fever with toxic appearance, and abnormal cardiovascular examination. Do not apply adult ACS pathways uncritically to paediatric patients.

Pregnancy

Pregnancy increases VTE risk and changes the differential diagnosis. PE, aortic pathology, and spontaneous coronary artery dissection are important considerations. Investigate and image appropriately when clinically indicated. Do not dismiss significant chest pain as reflux without proper assessment.

Older adults

Older patients often present atypically and may have baseline ECG abnormalities, multiple comorbidities, and higher risk of adverse outcomes. Dyspnoea, collapse, delirium, or weakness may represent ACS.

Patients with chronic kidney disease

Troponin may be chronically elevated. Interpretation depends on symptoms, ECG, and dynamic change. Do not assume every raised troponin is ACS, but do not dismiss ACS because the patient has CKD.

Immunosuppressed patients

Consider atypical infection, fungal disease, opportunistic pathology, and blunted inflammatory responses. Chest pain with sepsis, hypoxia, or haemodynamic compromise needs broad thinking.

Cocaine-associated chest pain

Consider ACS, coronary vasospasm, arrhythmia, aortic dissection, and severe hypertension. Management should follow local toxicology and ACS guidance. Do not trivialise the presentation because the patient is young.

Known CAD, prior PCI, or CABG

Previous coronary disease increases the probability of ACS. Prior normal angiography or previous revascularisation does not rule out a new event.

Common Pitfalls

  • assuming a normal ECG excludes ACS
  • assuming a single negative troponin excludes MI in an early presenter
  • using typical versus atypical angina classification to rule out acute ACS
  • forgetting aortic dissection before giving antithrombotics
  • sending troponin without a clear clinical question and then over-interpreting a minor elevation
  • missing posterior MI because there is no obvious ST elevation on the standard 12-lead
  • using exercise ECG as first-line investigation for stable chest pain
  • discharging patients with recurrent pain before a validated pathway is complete
  • being falsely reassured by reproducible or pleuritic pain
  • forgetting PE, tamponade, pneumothorax, or oesophageal rupture

FRCEM and MRCEM Exam Tips

  • ECG within 10 minutes is a standard chest pain rule
  • normal ECG does not rule out ACS
  • serial ECGs matter, especially during pain
  • exercise ECG is no longer first-line for diagnosing stable angina
  • CTCA is first-line for stable chest pain of possible coronary origin
  • legacy CG95 timing categories still appear in SBAs
  • modern ED practice relies on validated hs-troponin pathways and clinical risk assessment
  • LBBB is not automatic reperfusion, but it should increase concern
  • posterior MI and de Winter pattern should trigger urgent reperfusion discussion
  • oxygen is not routine in normoxic ACS patients
  • aspirin 300 mg is standard in suspected ACS unless contraindicated or dissection is suspected

How This Appears in SBA Questions

Typical question stems include:

  • a patient with ongoing central chest pain and a normal initial ECG
  • a pain-free patient whose chest pain occurred 6 hours ago
  • a patient with exertional chest tightness relieved by rest asking for the next investigation
  • a patient with chest pain and ST depression in V1 to V3
  • a patient with chest pain, pulse deficit, and inter-arm BP difference
  • an older diabetic patient with breathlessness and epigastric discomfort

Key discriminator clues:

  • ongoing pain means immediate ED ACS assessment
  • normal ECG does not make the patient low risk
  • posterior MI pattern is an occlusion pattern
  • stable exertional symptoms point towards CTCA, not exercise ECG
  • tearing pain, neurology, or pulse deficit points towards dissection
  • timing from symptom onset affects troponin interpretation

Common wrong-answer traps:

  • discharge after one negative troponin taken too early
  • exercise ECG as first-line stable angina test
  • routine oxygen for all ACS patients
  • assuming reproducible pain excludes ACS
  • giving antiplatelets immediately when the stem suggests dissection
  • waiting for troponin before activating reperfusion in clear STEMI or occlusion MI

Key Takeaways

  • Assess the patient first with ABCDE and identify instability early.
  • Think beyond ACS: dissection, PE, tension pneumothorax, tamponade, and oesophageal rupture are key killers.
  • Obtain a 12-lead ECG within 10 minutes in suspected cardiac chest pain.
  • A normal ECG does not exclude ACS; serial ECGs are often needed.
  • Use hs-troponin according to local validated pathways and symptom timing.
  • A raised troponin means myocardial injury, not automatically type 1 MI.
  • Give aspirin 300 mg in suspected ACS unless contraindicated or dissection is a realistic concern.
  • Do not give routine oxygen to normoxic ACS patients.
  • Posterior MI and de Winter pattern should trigger urgent reperfusion discussion.
  • Typical, atypical, and non-anginal classifications are for stable chest pain, not acute ACS rule-out.
  • CT coronary angiography is first-line for stable chest pain of possible coronary origin.
  • Exercise ECG is no longer first-line for diagnosing stable angina.
  • Legacy CG95 timing rules are still examinable, but modern ED practice is based on ECG, risk, and hs-troponin pathways.

Further Reading

  • NICE CG95: Chest pain of recent onset: assessment and diagnosis
  • NICE guideline NG185: Acute coronary syndromes
  • RCEM guidance and local chest pain pathways
  • Resuscitation Council UK guidance on acute care and oxygen use
  • SIGN guidance on acute coronary syndromes where locally relevant
  • British Cardiovascular Society and local PPCI network guidance

Related on EM Final Exams

Authoritative Sources


Ready to build your plan? EMF Premium gives you all 40,000 questions and 20 mocks for £59 — one payment, six months' access.

Share
0
    0
    Your Cart
    Your cart is emptyReturn to Shop